2014-15 Economically
Disadvantaged (FRL) Rate
(as reported on Survey 3)
Elementary School
PK-6
Yes
100%
Primary Service Type
(per MSID File)
Charter School
2018-19 Minority Rate
(Reported as Non-white
on Survey 2)
K-12 General Education
No
38%
School Grades History
Year
2014-15
2013-14
2012-13
2011-12
Grade
C*
F
D
C
*Informational Baseline School Grade
Note:
The school grades calculation was revised substantially for the 2014-15 school year
to implement statutory changes made by the 2014 Legislature
and incorporate the new Florida Standards Assessments.
The 2014-15 school grades serve as informational baseline data
that schools can use to improve in future years.
School Board Approval
This plan was approved by the
Putnam
County School Board on
12/8/2015.
SIP Authority and Template
Section 1001.42(18), Florida Statutes, requires district school boards to annually approve and require implementation of a school improvement plan (SIP) for each school in the district.
The Florida Department of Education (FDOE) SIP template meets all statutory and rule requirements for traditional public schools and incorporates all components required for schools receiving Title I funds.
This template is required by State Board of Education Rule 6A-1.099811, Florida Administrative Code, for all non- charter schools with a current grade of D or F or a monitoring status of "Former F" (see page 4).
For all other schools, the district may use a template of its choosing. All districts must submit annual assurances that their plans meet statutory requirements.
This document was prepared by school and district leadership using the Florida Department of Education’s school improvement planning web application located at
https://www.floridaCIMS.org.
Purpose and Outline of the SIP
The SIP is intended to be the primary artifact used by every school with stakeholders to review data, set goals, create an action plan and monitor progress. A corollary at the district level is the District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP), designed to help district leadership make the necessary connections between school and district goals in order to align resources. The Florida Department of Education encourages schools to use the SIP as a “living document” by continually updating, refining and using the plan to guide their work throughout the year. This printed version represents the SIP as of the “Date Modified” listed in the footer.
Part I: Current School Status
Part I organizes the current status of the school around five domains inspired by the 5Essentials framework: Supportive Environment, Family and Community Involvement, Effective Leadership, Public and Collaborative Teaching, and Ambitious Instruction and Learning. Questions regarding the school’s Multi-Tiered System of Supports have been embedded throughout this part to demonstrate how data is used by stakeholders to understand the needs of all students and allocate appropriate resources in proportion to those needs.
Part II: Needs Assessment
Part II requires the school to review performance and early warning systems data in order to develop strategic goals and associated data targets (i.e., “SMART goals”) for the coming school year in context of the school’s greatest strengths and needs. An online tool was developed, which includes data visualizations and processing questions to support problem identification, problem analysis and strategic goal formulation.
Part III: 8-Step Planning and Problem Solving for Implementation
Part III enables the school to develop implementation plans for its highest-priority goals. With the overview of the current state of the school in mind and the strategic goals identified through the needs assessment, the planning team engages in a facilitated planning and problem-solving process, through which they
Define strategic goals and establish targets to be reached by successfully achieving the goals (Step 1)
Identify barriers that could hinder achieving those goals and resources that could be used to eliminate or reduce barriers (Step 2)
Select high-priority barriers they want to address initially (Step 3)
Design implementation and monitoring plans for strategies to resolve selected barriers (Steps 4-7)
Determine how they will monitor progress toward each goal (Step 8)
Appendices
The following appendices, automatically-generated from content entered in Part III, are included in this document:
Appendix 1 is a timeline of all action steps and monitoring activities
Appendix 2 is an outline of all professional development opportunities and technical assistance items
Appendix 3 is a report of the budget needed to implement the strategies
Differentiated Accountability
Florida’s Differentiated Accountability (DA) system, established in
section 1008.33, Florida Statutes,
is a statewide network of strategic support, differentiated by need according to performance data, provided to
districts and schools in order to improve leadership capacity, teacher efficacy, and student outcomes. Through
a data-driven planning and problem-solving process, DA field teams collaborate with district leadership to design,
implement, and refine strategic goals and action plans that are documented in the SIP.
DA Regions
Florida’s DA network is divided into four geographical regions, each served by a field team led by a regional
executive director (RED).
DA Categories
At the start of each academic year, traditional schools are classified for DA support in three categories based
on the most recent school grades data available. Descriptions of each DA category along with the state support
and interventions provided are set forth by
Rule 6A-1.099811, Florida Administrative Code:
Not in DA – currently A, B, or C and not Monitoring Only; charter schools; ungraded schools
Monitoring Only – currently A, B, or C that improved from a previous grade of F
Focus – currently D
Priority – currently F
DA Turnaround and Monitoring Statuses
Additionally, schools in DA may be subject to a turnaround status of “Planning” or “Implementing” or a
monitoring status of "Former F." These statuses are based on a school’s grades history, including the current
school grade:
Former F
-
A school with a status of "Former F" requires the department to monitor the implementation of strategies
and progress toward the goals outlined in the school improvement plan for three years following the school’s
improvement from a grade of F to a C or higher.
Planning
-
A school with a status of "Planning" requires the district to engage stakeholders in the development of a
turnaround option plan to be implemented in the following year should the school grade not improve to a
C or higher.
Implementing
-
A school with a status of "Implementing" requires the district to submit a turnaround plan to the State Board of
Education for approval and implementation. A school remains in “Implementing” status until its school grade
improves to a C or higher.
2015-16
DA Category and Statuses for
Ochwilla Elementary School
We will ensure the success of every student at high levels of learning.
We will create a collaborative culture that uses standards-based differentiated instruction to ensure student success.
We have a single school wide positive behavior plan to include 5 Whole Brain rules, point systems in each class room, unified fun activities based on the points, and quarterly celebrations. During these opportunities the teachers interact with the students and family members and learn from one another. We hold weekly class councils and involve the Northeast Florida Community Action Agency as a partner to serve our community.
The North-East Florida Community Action Agency is a non-profit group which uses grant funding to help indigent individuals and families pay for electricity, access government assistance, and engage in their community to gain training and education to better their lives and build skills for future employment.
We have developed opportunities for children to enjoy before-school activities both physical and intellectual, we have enforced policies regarding bullying, respect, and behavior, and we provide a safe atmosphere with adult supervision after school. We also have a school-wide PBS plan that involves students being individually recognized and being recognized as a class for demonstrating traits of "good character" (Character Counts). We utilize positive referrals as well where teachers can write students up for positive reasons. In such cases, home contact is made and students receive rewards accordingly. In addition, we view students through the lens of a Growth Mindset hoping to inspire students to positively react to challenges instead of feeling defeated when meeting them. Likewise, our academic reward systems (iReady rewards) reward academic growth which encourages students to continue to strive to achieve.
In every classroom on campus, teachers use a fluid behavior management system where student behavior is charted on a "clip chart" with 5-6 levels. Students begin each day with their clips in the center or on "Ready to Learn". Based on positive or negative behaviors, students can move in either direction yielding consequences or rewards. Likewise, students always have the opportunity to recover after they have made an inappropriate choice warranting moving clips down. This system should maximize student instructional time by eliminating or minimizing student misbehavior.
We are also using a school-wide Whole-Brain teaching set of five rules:
1. Follow Directions Quickly
2. Raise your hand to speak
3. Raise your hand to leave your seat
4. Make Smart Choices
5. Keep your dear teacher happy
These are used in every room and every setting at the school, including the cafeteria and library.
Our guidance counselor conducts guidance lessons on character traits in all grade levels. We utilize select resource officers in county to mentor select students. We also hold weekly class counsels that address the social needs of children, especially the key developmental shift years of 2nd and 4th grades.
The school's response to this section may be used to satisfy the requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 6314(b)(1)(B)(ii)(III), (b)(1)(B)(iii)(I), and (b)(1)(I).
Our early warning system includes quarterly data reviews to discuss students not attending regularly (90%), students who have shown behavior problems, and students who have academic deficiencies. These meetings help us to create action plans for further intervention. Also, our MTSS team, including the school psychologist, is adept at identifying and putting in place interventions for these children who show acute issues in between semester meeting times. This process has shown to be very successful in curbing behaviors and in identifying students with academic needs beyond the regular curriculum. Likewise, there is a district mental health counselor available when needed.
Indicator
Grade Level
Total
K
1
2
3
4
5
Attendance below 90 percent
10
13
8
10
10
4
55
One or more suspensions
1
6
2
2
4
0
15
Course failure in ELA or Math
0
0
0
1
2
0
3
Level 1 on statewide assessment
0
3
5
10
5
22
45
Indicator
Grade Level
Total
2
5
Students exhibiting two or more indicators
1
2
3
Children displaying these signs are given one or more of the following interventions in an attempt to change their deficiencies:
1. Tier 2 instruction in academic area of need
2. A behavior plan, including time with Tier 2 behavior instruction with the counselor.
3. Attendance incentives for individuals.
4. Attendance meetings with families, guidance counselor, and law enforcement.
5. Supplemental instructional support in reading and math through computer-based learning.
The school's response to this section may be used to satisfy the requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 6314(b)(1)(B)(iii)(I)(aa).
Title I schools use the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP) to meet the requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 6314(b)(1)(F).
Yes
The school completes a Parental Involvement Plan (PFEP), which is available at the school site.
We will have an increase in parent attendees at student led conferences from an average of 38% to 50%.
We have partnered with Northeast Florida Community Action Agency to provide families with financial and work-related resources to help engage families in the school and community, to provide students with a work experience program, and to provide families with events related to community service. We have a partnership with Woodlawn Baptist Church, who provides approximately $10,000 worth of food for our hungry families and donations of clothes and school supplies each year. Johnson RCMA also partners with the school to further early childhood education and parental classes designed to engage parents in the education of their children. We hold several parent nights each year combining student performances, food, and educational material in the further attempt to bring parents into the process.Finally, the Rotary Club has offered its services to assist children with clothing needs as well as other items as determined on a case by case basis.
The school's response to this section may be used to satisfy the requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 6314(b)(1)(H).
Name
Title
Wynn, Montez
Principal
Thornton, Tammie
Assistant Principal
Deguzman, Leigh
Instructional Coach
Pilling, Donna
School Counselor
Mathis, Marion
Instructional Coach
Montez Wynn and Tammie Driggers: Monitoring progress on the SIP, monitoring the effectiveness of the MTSS team. Also, participate in individual student MTSS meetings to help remove barriers and align resources.
Leigh DeGuzman: Bring instructional resources and expertise to assist teachers in the entire scope of the MTSS model, from Tier I to Tier III. Also, facilitate iReady growth monitoring and diagnostic testing.
Donna Pilling: Facilitate the MTSS student meetings, record and assist in the development of student plans, and provide teachers with ideas for interventions and methods of progress monitoring.
Marion Mathis: Coaching math instruction and providing support to the educational leaders in the coaching, evaluating, and retention of teachers.
Ochwilla uses MTSS to develop our priorities in funding, staffing, PD, resource allocation, and student placement by using summative assessment data to identify priorities, creating goals for short term instructional purposes, and then use progress monitoring data to guide short term priorities and intervention levels.
District support will additionally include the use of Ryan Zimmerman for assistance with science planning and data analysis.
Title I. Part A. Programs are coordinated through the Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment department at the district level and include the Assistant Superintendent and personnel from ESE, MTSS, ESOL, PBS and School Improvement (Federal Programs). This team meets monthly (at a minimum) and establishes and monitors program evaluation for all schools to ensure entitlement programs’ resources are available and fully implemented at each school site and that all funds are used effectively and efficiently as possible. School sites have the responsibility of keeping an inventory of resources purchased with Title I. Communication throughout the year is ongoing with the building level administrators regarding progress toward the goals and objectives as stated in the grants. Coordination of these services is done in the following ways:
(1) Principal and Assistant Principal meetings are scheduled monthly;
(2) Progress monitoring assessments are completed during the year, with the results reported to each participating school for review. Revisions in objectives or instructional strategies are addressed and implemented to meet the needs of all students;
(3) Email dissemination regarding school improvement, technical assistance, and data guidance are made available to school leaders;
(4) All schools participate in an Instructional Review to identify individual school needs and desired support;
(5) Support for schools is differentiated based on each school’s current academic performance, teacher quality, leadership experience, and supportive environment;
(6) Collaborative assistance is provided by consultants hired to address specific deficiencies demonstrated by participating schools through assessment analysis;
(7) Professional development and support is coordinated with school leaders and provided by School Improvement Specialists and the Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment department on topics including lesson planning, instructional practices, resources, and problem solving.
Title I, Part C. In addition to the services provided by Title I, Part A, the district uses Part C funds to improve the academic achievement of the school’s migratory children. Title I, Part C initiatives are coordinated by the Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment department, Federal Programs, and Exceptional Student Education.
Title I, Part D. In addition to the services provided by Title I, Part A, the district maintains collaborative and partner-like relationships with Family Medical and Dental Services and Putnam Health to serve homeless, neglected, and delinquent students by providing health services. The District partners with the Department of Juvenile Justice and Putnam County Sheriff’s Department to target delinquent students and provide mentoring and counseling services that foster relationships and provide supplemental support services. Funds are also utilized to provide services at the district’s Solutions Center (Alternative Center).
Title II. Part A. The Title II Project Director meets with Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment personnel as well as the directors of Title I and Title VI to ensure coordination and alignment of activities and fiscal support. At the district level, content coach positions in ELA, Math, and Science are funded as resource support for schools and teachers. Funds are also utilized to provide professional development for teachers and administrators at the district level. Funds are allocated at each school site to support professional development specific to the needs of the teachers as determined by the needs of their students.
Title III. The Title III Coordinator supports our English Language Learner (ELL) population by coordinating with schools to provide professional development opportunities for teachers, tutoring assistance for students based on need, after school programs for parents and students, and supplemental materials. In addition, a teaching assistant position is funded at Crescent City High School.
Title VI. Part B. The Title VI Project Director meets with Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment personnel as well as the directors of Title I and Title II to ensure coordination and alignment of activities and fiscal support. Funds are utilized to provide professional development for teachers to improve standards-based instruction. At the secondary level, funds are also utilized to provide credit recovery and tutoring for students to pass Florida EOC exams.
Nutrition Programs. Each student in Putnam County is provided free breakfast and lunch through the Community Eligibility Provision Program (CEP).
Adult Education. Adult education is available at Saint Johns River State College through a collaboration with Workforce.
Housing Programs. The district has a working relationship with the Putnam County Public Housing Authority.The authority supports the district by encouraging parents to participate in parental involvement designed to increase student achievement.
Violence Prevention Programs. The district works collaboratively with the Department of Juvenile Justice to provide support to students in need of behavioral interventions within and/or outside the school day.
Career and Technical Education. The Career and Technical Education (CTE) department works closely with students and business partners to provide each student the opportunity to leave high school as a highly skilled graduate with the skills necessary to thrive in current and future careers.
Name
Stakeholder Group
Kaeli Parrish
Student
Keith Biggs
Teacher
Brian Parrish
Parent
Montez Wynn
Principal
Shawn Goode
Parent
Sandra Simpkins
Parent
Felicia Walker
Parent
Teri Jo Myers
Parent
Student
The SAC team will review school data, discuss outcome goals, give input on the strategies going forward, and hold the leadership accountable for follow through of SIP goals and points of data.
The team has already given a great deal of input and have many unique ideas for engaging the parents and community to help the students achieve goals.
The SAC will be the committee who writes and edits the SIP based on school data and outcome goals.
The SAC will be informed and will give input on the budget to help find the most efficient use of funds.
We used the funds last year to improve technology access for the students which helped them learn and practice skills in center activities.
Yes
Name
Title
Deguzman, Leigh
Instructional Coach
Wynn, Montez
Principal
Thornton, Tammie
Assistant Principal
Mathis, Marion
Instructional Coach
Major initiatives include:
1. Shift to Florida Standards
2. Aligning current resources
3. Implementing the district adopted ELA adoption- HMH Journeys, and use of iReady
The school's response to this section may be used to satisfy the requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 6314(b)(1)(D).
We continue to refine the PLC process in our school. We work in the collaborative teams, based on grade levels, weekly during the contract hours. We have systems set in place to ensure that teachers are able to collaboratively plan and that students receive differentiated remediation during the school day.
Wynn and Driggers are responsible for creating interview teams and will review applications for those positions posted as vacant. Professional Development will be provided to new and continuing teachers, supporting development will be provided by mentor teachers and the Human Resources department.
New teachers are paired with mentor teachers who, if possible, share grade level and content areas with the new teachers. They have a program, developed by the district, to complete for basic competencies, and they are given the opportunity to observe their mentors and participate in lesson study to further a deeper understanding of planning, instructional processes, and data research that will make them effective teachers.
A vetting process for the HMH Journeys reading program was enacted by the district and included faculty members from all schools as well as reading specialists at the district level. We use the math program, Engage New York because it is aligned to the new Florida Standards. Likewise, we utilize MFAS to supplement that instruction. Our writing program, Be a Writer, is aligned to the standards and has been vetted by members of faculties in Florida. Our science program, Discovery Ed Science, is a nationally recognized series which is not totally aligned to the standards and is therefore supplemented by teacher-accessed materials. Finally, we use iReady as our reading and math intervention school-wide.
Our use of data includes formative and summative assessment data from past national and state assessments, FAIR assessments, iReady, Performance Matters, Engage NY, and HMH Journeys, to allow us to properly track student mastery of standards. In our PLCs we use data to identify areas in need of remediation and design remediation plans for the students in need. Our MTSS process identifies students who need a level of scaffolding that goes beyond remediation and we have interventionists in the class rooms who provide that further support.
Strategy:
Summer Program
Minutes added to school year:
1,350
The district provided all teachers with three days of summer professional development and planning using the Learning Focused Framework. Teachers were provided guidance on the components of the framework and then had time to collaborate and plan lessons aligned to Florida Standards.
In an effort to strengthen core instruction, the district has adopted the research based Learning Focused Framework to guide teachers in planning standards-based instruction.
Teacher collaboration, planning and professional development
Wynn, Montez, mwynn@my.putnamschools.org
School administrators will monitor the implementation of the Learning Focused Framework using walkthroughs, lesson plan review, and teacher observations. This data will be collected in iObservation. School administrators will also engage in analysis of student achievement data with the school-based leadership team and teachers.
The school's response to this question may be used to satisfy the requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 6314(b)(1)(G).
Our school offers PreK, ESE PreK, and receives students from other VPK programs in the community. We have family meetings with the parents and family members of these children and inform them of future requirements and helpful information for parents. We also have a kindergarten roundup in the spring and over the summer to register children and prepare families for school.
The following documents were submitted as evidence for this section:
No files were uploaded
As a result of having earned the grade of an F, Ochwilla data was analyzed revealing a major deficit in the area of student differentiated instruction. To support and enhance student achievement through focused learning with differentiated instruction, this year, we created strategic goals that would suffice. Teachers will assist in meeting these goals through whole group, small group, interventions and technology.
The following key is intended to help readers understand how the
sections of this document correspond to the steps of the 8-step
planning and problem-solving framework used in the
School Improvement Plan.
The Quick Key numbers can help registered users go directly to the point of entry for any given goal, barrier and strategy within the online survey.
Problem Solving Key
G
= Goal
B
= Barrier
S
= Strategy
1
= Problem Solving Step
S123456
= Quick Key
If our teachers plan and implement differentiated instruction, based on formative data in all content areas, then we will see an improvement in student achievement.
For each strategic goal, this section lists the associated targets (i.e., “SMART goals”), targeted barriers to
achieving the goal, resources available to help
reduce or eliminate the barriers, and the plan for monitoring progress toward the goal.
G063486
Indicator
Annual Target
FSA ELA Achievement
35.0
FSA Mathematics Achievement
26.0
FCAT 2.0 Science Proficiency
50.0
ELA Achievement District Assessment
50.0
ELA/Reading Gains District Assessment
100.0
Math Gains District Assessment
100.0
Math Achievement District Assessment
55.0
Professional Development in Differentiation
PLC at Work strategies
HMH Journeys Program
Be a Writer Program
Pull comparative data comparing Diagnostic 1 and 2 in both reading and math looking for a 10% increase or higher in growth
Montez Wynn
Quarterly, from 8/31/2015 to 1/29/2016
Our school's growth average in iReady will increase by at least 10% from Diagnostic 1 to the 2nd Diagnostic
Analyze state assessment data
Montez Wynn
On 6/15/2016
FSA data, spreadsheet with comparative data, notes, etc.
For each strategy selected in the plan to reduce a targeted barrier to a strategic goal, this section lists the rationale for that strategy (i.e., why the school believes it will reduce the barrier) and the action steps that have been identified as necessary to implementing the strategy, including details such as the point person, timing and duration, and evidence of completion. At the end of each set of action steps is the plan for monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of the respective strategy.
Problem Solving Key
G
= Goal
B
= Barrier
S
= Strategy
1
= Problem Solving Step
S123456
= Quick Key
G063486
B163429
S174924
Strategy Rationale
By providing PD in iReady differentiation, instruction and modeling in how to use the data, and then modeling how the strategies needed are to be implemented we will see a clear growth in differentiation inside the instructional block and an improvement in student achievement scores.
Teachers will print out and use the iReady group differentiation charts to regularly reevaluate groups based on group and individual needs
Leigh Deguzman
Weekly, from 8/31/2015 to 5/27/2016
Grouping charts from iReady will be kept behind current lesson plans for monitoring purposes
Teachers will partake in PD regarding how to locate and utilize the iReady grouping charts and resources for intervention and differentiation (will be done in PLCs)
Leigh Deguzman
On 8/31/2015
PLC sign in sheet and agenda for PD
Administration will send out email clarification to support CRT and Math Coach regarding common board configuration (scales, EQs, learning goals, size of display, font, etc.)
Tammie Thornton
Every 3 Weeks, from 10/13/2015 to 11/16/2015
Email copy
1st grade will receive specific support from coach(es) with scale development for learning goals
Leigh Deguzman
Weekly, from 10/9/2015 to 11/23/2015
PLC agenda specific to creation of scales, sign in sheets
Administration will meet with CRT weekly to discuss progress of teacher "differentiation plans".
Montez Wynn
Weekly, from 8/31/2015 to 5/27/2016
CRT notes, meeting notes
Administration will preview PD plan with CRT and will attend the PD session
Montez Wynn
Weekly, from 8/31/2015 to 5/27/2016
PD plans and agenda/meeting notes
Teachers will become adept at implementing differentiation inside the classroom.
Montez Wynn
Weekly, from 8/31/2015 to 5/29/2016
Student work and classroom observation will show a continuous cycle of differentiation where students are accessing the material at the levels they need in order to grow to proficiency or at least demonstrating adequate growth of 1.5 years.
S206978
Strategy Rationale
By intensifying coaching for these select individuals, teacher performance and student achievement should increase.
Create individual reading coaching plans for select teachers and meet weekly with them to review the plans.
Leigh Deguzman
Weekly, from 2/19/2016 to 5/6/2016
Coaching notes
Create individual math coaching plans for select teachers and meet weekly with them to review the plans.
Marion Mathis
Weekly, from 2/19/2016 to 5/6/2016
Coaching notes
During lead team meetings, administration will inquire about the weekly coaching progress of select teachers and receive feedback from coaches.
Montez Wynn
Weekly, from 2/26/2016 to 5/6/2016
Lead team meeting notes; relative data of select teachers; administrative observations
Administration will conduct observations in the classrooms of these select teachers during differentiated instruction time. Likewise, administration will monitor iReady data for those classes to note progress of students.
Montez Wynn
Monthly, from 2/26/2016 to 5/6/2016
iReady data on select classes and teacher observation data for select classes
Professional development opportunities identified in the SIP as action steps to achieve the school's goals.
Teachers will partake in PD regarding how to locate and utilize the iReady grouping charts and resources for intervention and differentiation (will be done in PLCs)
Deguzman, Leigh (CRT)
Grade level teachers, CRT, and an administrator
On 8/31/2015
Create individual reading coaching plans for select teachers and meet weekly with them to review the plans.
Leigh DeGuzman
Select teachers identified by lead team.
Weekly, from 2/19/2016 to 5/6/2016
Create individual math coaching plans for select teachers and meet weekly with them to review the plans.
Marion Mathis
Select teachers identified by lead team.
Weekly, from 2/19/2016 to 5/6/2016
Technical Assistance opportunities identified in the SIP as action steps to achieve the school's goals.
1
G1.B1.S1.A1
Teachers will print out and use the iReady group differentiation charts to regularly reevaluate groups based on group and individual needs
$0.00
2
G1.B1.S1.A2
Teachers will partake in PD regarding how to locate and utilize the iReady grouping charts and resources for intervention and differentiation (will be done in PLCs)
$0.00
3
G1.B1.S1.A3
Administration will send out email clarification to support CRT and Math Coach regarding common board configuration (scales, EQs, learning goals, size of display, font, etc.)
$0.00
4
G1.B1.S1.A4
1st grade will receive specific support from coach(es) with scale development for learning goals
$0.00
5
G1.B1.S1.A5
$0.00
6
G1.B1.S2.A1
Create individual reading coaching plans for select teachers and meet weekly with them to review the plans.
$0.00
7
G1.B1.S2.A2
Create individual math coaching plans for select teachers and meet weekly with them to review the plans.